<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 158 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211294</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi confirmed a demand of approximately Rs. 55 lakhs against the appellants for not depositing duty collected from Railways despite availing concessional rates under Notification No.175/86. The Tribunal remanded the matter to accurately quantify the duty demand, considering the duty paid by the appellants under the notification. The appellants were granted the opportunity to address penalties during the remand process, emphasizing the importance of presenting relevant evidence and arguments at the proper stages of legal proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2012 10:13:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184715" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 158 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211294</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi confirmed a demand of approximately Rs. 55 lakhs against the appellants for not depositing duty collected from Railways despite availing concessional rates under Notification No.175/86. The Tribunal remanded the matter to accurately quantify the duty demand, considering the duty paid by the appellants under the notification. The appellants were granted the opportunity to address penalties during the remand process, emphasizing the importance of presenting relevant evidence and arguments at the proper stages of legal proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>