<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 829 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211290</link>
    <description>A partial pre-deposit may be directed where the record shows a prima facie case and the revenue can be adequately secured without insisting on full deposit. In this note on clandestine manufacture and clearance of MS ingots, the Tribunal considered the demand to be within the normal limitation period and noted that the penalty on the assessee arose under Rule 25, while the director faced penalty under Rule 26 rather than section 11AC. On that basis, it reduced the pre-deposit, required a limited deposit towards penalty, and remitted the appeals to the Commissioner (Appeals) for disposal on merits after compliance and in accordance with natural justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 829 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211290</link>
      <description>A partial pre-deposit may be directed where the record shows a prima facie case and the revenue can be adequately secured without insisting on full deposit. In this note on clandestine manufacture and clearance of MS ingots, the Tribunal considered the demand to be within the normal limitation period and noted that the penalty on the assessee arose under Rule 25, while the director faced penalty under Rule 26 rather than section 11AC. On that basis, it reduced the pre-deposit, required a limited deposit towards penalty, and remitted the appeals to the Commissioner (Appeals) for disposal on merits after compliance and in accordance with natural justice.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>