<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 151 - Karnataka High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211278</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decision of the Tribunal regarding the classification of land as a capital asset post-conversion permission date. It found no illegality in the Tribunal&#039;s reasoning and dismissed the appeal, stating it did not violate statutory provisions. The court concluded that since no illegality or statutory violation was found, there was no need to further analyze the legal questions raised in the appeal, resulting in its dismissal at the threshold.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 19:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184699" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 151 - Karnataka High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211278</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decision of the Tribunal regarding the classification of land as a capital asset post-conversion permission date. It found no illegality in the Tribunal&#039;s reasoning and dismissed the appeal, stating it did not violate statutory provisions. The court concluded that since no illegality or statutory violation was found, there was no need to further analyze the legal questions raised in the appeal, resulting in its dismissal at the threshold.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211278</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>