<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 739 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211267</link>
    <description>A winding-up petition is maintainable where the alleged debt is not shown to be bona fide disputed on substantial grounds. The court examined the correspondence and found that the company had acknowledged receipt of the transformer and had repeatedly sought time for payment, while its plea of further payments was unsubstantiated; the denial of liability was therefore not bona fide. The existence of an arbitration clause does not oust the company court&#039;s statutory power to entertain a winding-up petition, because an arbitrator cannot order winding up. On these principles, the petition was admitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 739 - ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211267</link>
      <description>A winding-up petition is maintainable where the alleged debt is not shown to be bona fide disputed on substantial grounds. The court examined the correspondence and found that the company had acknowledged receipt of the transformer and had repeatedly sought time for payment, while its plea of further payments was unsubstantiated; the denial of liability was therefore not bona fide. The existence of an arbitration clause does not oust the company court&#039;s statutory power to entertain a winding-up petition, because an arbitrator cannot order winding up. On these principles, the petition was admitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211267</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>