<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1034 - Gujarat High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211256</link>
    <description>A pre-deposit condition for restoration of appeals may be modified where revenue dues are substantially secured by attachment of immovable property and partial payment has already been made. The Court balanced recovery interests against the need to hear the appeals on merits and granted only limited relief: the petitioners were allowed to raise a loan against the attached property and deposit the remaining amount within the stipulated time, after which the appeals would be restored. The attachment was preserved until the appeals were heard and decided on merits, reflecting a restricted, justice-oriented modification rather than full waiver of the security requirement.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184677" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1034 - Gujarat High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211256</link>
      <description>A pre-deposit condition for restoration of appeals may be modified where revenue dues are substantially secured by attachment of immovable property and partial payment has already been made. The Court balanced recovery interests against the need to hear the appeals on merits and granted only limited relief: the petitioners were allowed to raise a loan against the attached property and deposit the remaining amount within the stipulated time, after which the appeals would be restored. The attachment was preserved until the appeals were heard and decided on merits, reflecting a restricted, justice-oriented modification rather than full waiver of the security requirement.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>