<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 731 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211239</link>
    <description>The High Court allowed the Tax Case Appeals, ruling in favor of the Revenue on all substantial legal questions. The reopening of assessments under Section 147 was upheld as valid, even if based on audit objections. Additionally, the income from letting out property was classified as &quot;income from house property&quot; rather than &quot;business income,&quot; based on the nature of the activities involved.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2015 13:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 731 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211239</link>
      <description>The High Court allowed the Tax Case Appeals, ruling in favor of the Revenue on all substantial legal questions. The reopening of assessments under Section 147 was upheld as valid, even if based on audit objections. Additionally, the income from letting out property was classified as &quot;income from house property&quot; rather than &quot;business income,&quot; based on the nature of the activities involved.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211239</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>