<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 816 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211232</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods due to misdeclaration by the appellant company, citing discrepancies in the quantity declared and actual quantity found in consignments. The reduction of DEPB/Drawback benefit was upheld based on revised weight of exported goods. Redemption fines and penalties imposed were significantly reduced for quantity discrepancies. The Tribunal modified penalties, deeming the original amounts excessive. The appeal against the adjudicating authority&#039;s order resulted in adjustments to fines and penalties, with directions for refunding the balance from the appellant&#039;s deposits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 816 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211232</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of goods due to misdeclaration by the appellant company, citing discrepancies in the quantity declared and actual quantity found in consignments. The reduction of DEPB/Drawback benefit was upheld based on revised weight of exported goods. Redemption fines and penalties imposed were significantly reduced for quantity discrepancies. The Tribunal modified penalties, deeming the original amounts excessive. The appeal against the adjudicating authority&#039;s order resulted in adjustments to fines and penalties, with directions for refunding the balance from the appellant&#039;s deposits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211232</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>