https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211230 The Court found the winding up petition maintainable despite the respondent's argument on the service of the statutory winding up notice. The respondent company's admission of the debt and the waiver of the right to receive notices at the registered office were crucial factors. The Court deemed the respondent's defense as unsubstantiated and granted them eight weeks to pay the debt. Failure to comply would result in the admission of the petition, allowing the petitioner to publish citations as specified. Further proceedings were scheduled for 23rd March 2012. en-us Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Mar 2012 10:28:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211230 The Court found the winding up petition maintainable despite the respondent's argument on the service of the statutory winding up notice. The respondent company's admission of the debt and the waiver of the right to receive notices at the registered office were crucial factors. The Court deemed the respondent's defense as unsubstantiated and granted them eight weeks to pay the debt. Failure to comply would result in the admission of the petition, allowing the petitioner to publish citations as specified. Further proceedings were scheduled for 23rd March 2012. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211230