<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 724 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211228</link>
    <description>Supplies from the Domestic Tariff Area to SEZ developers and promoters are treated as exports for export-related benefits under the SEZ regime, because the SEZ Act definition of export overrides inconsistent provisions in other laws. As a result, Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 and 2004 does not apply to require reversal or payment on such clearances. The 2008 amendment to Rule 6(6) of the 2004 Rules was applied retrospectively to recognise the SEZ exemption policy for developers as well as units, but not to the 2002 Rules. In this interpretative setting, extended limitation and penalties were not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 18:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184649" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 724 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211228</link>
      <description>Supplies from the Domestic Tariff Area to SEZ developers and promoters are treated as exports for export-related benefits under the SEZ regime, because the SEZ Act definition of export overrides inconsistent provisions in other laws. As a result, Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 and 2004 does not apply to require reversal or payment on such clearances. The 2008 amendment to Rule 6(6) of the 2004 Rules was applied retrospectively to recognise the SEZ exemption policy for developers as well as units, but not to the 2002 Rules. In this interpretative setting, extended limitation and penalties were not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211228</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>