<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 822 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211227</link>
    <description>The SC held that an appeal cannot be disposed of by a bare statement that it is not fit for interference when the issues raised are not examined and no reasons are recorded. In a Section 35G(1) Central Excise Act appeal, the High Court&#039;s failure to deal with the questions before it deprived the parties of a reasoned adjudication. The order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal de novo in accordance with law, with a reasoned order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Oct 2012 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184648" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 822 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211227</link>
      <description>The SC held that an appeal cannot be disposed of by a bare statement that it is not fit for interference when the issues raised are not examined and no reasons are recorded. In a Section 35G(1) Central Excise Act appeal, the High Court&#039;s failure to deal with the questions before it deprived the parties of a reasoned adjudication. The order was set aside and the matter was remitted for fresh disposal de novo in accordance with law, with a reasoned order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211227</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>