https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211225 The Tribunal upheld the department's case against the Appellant firm for fraudulent declaration and sale of defective goods, directing them to deposit 50% of the penalty. Registered dealers involved in issuing fraudulent invoices received waivers on pre-deposit requirements, with penalties stayed during appeal proceedings. The judgment focused on Rule 25 applicability and penalties under Central Excise Rules, 2002, finding the department's case strong based on evidence presented. en-us Wed, 25 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 10 Mar 2012 09:04:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211225 The Tribunal upheld the department's case against the Appellant firm for fraudulent declaration and sale of defective goods, directing them to deposit 50% of the penalty. Registered dealers involved in issuing fraudulent invoices received waivers on pre-deposit requirements, with penalties stayed during appeal proceedings. The judgment focused on Rule 25 applicability and penalties under Central Excise Rules, 2002, finding the department's case strong based on evidence presented. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 25 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211225