<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 721 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211224</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order, finding no concrete evidence to support allegations of clandestine removal or the shortage of MS ingots. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the need for substantive evidence and rejecting reliance on assumptions and mathematical calculations related to electricity consumption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Mar 2012 08:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184645" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 721 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211224</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order, finding no concrete evidence to support allegations of clandestine removal or the shortage of MS ingots. The appeal was allowed, emphasizing the need for substantive evidence and rejecting reliance on assumptions and mathematical calculations related to electricity consumption.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211224</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>