<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 132 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211215</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the issue back to the AO for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of natural justice and consideration of additional evidence. The appeals by both the assessee and the department were allowed for statistical purposes, directing a re-examination of the issues with the new evidence provided.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 18:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184636" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 132 - ITAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211215</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the issue back to the AO for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the importance of natural justice and consideration of additional evidence. The appeals by both the assessee and the department were allowed for statistical purposes, directing a re-examination of the issues with the new evidence provided.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211215</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>