<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 130 - ITAT, CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211213</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT (Appeals) decision to classify post-specific-date share transactions as business income. Emphasizing self-funded investments and historical practices, the Tribunal concluded that all short term gains should be considered capital gains. The appeal was partially allowed in favor of the assessee, with the Tribunal rejecting the alternate plea for rebate under section 88E. The decision was pronounced on January 5, 2012.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184634" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 130 - ITAT, CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211213</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, overturning the CIT (Appeals) decision to classify post-specific-date share transactions as business income. Emphasizing self-funded investments and historical practices, the Tribunal concluded that all short term gains should be considered capital gains. The appeal was partially allowed in favor of the assessee, with the Tribunal rejecting the alternate plea for rebate under section 88E. The decision was pronounced on January 5, 2012.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>