<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 126 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211209</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeals due to the delay in filing, emphasizing the need for a reasonable cause for condonation of delay. It clarified its limited jurisdiction under Section 254(2), stating that rectification cannot review a detailed order. The Tribunal stressed that once a finding is made after considering all submissions, it cannot be revisited, especially in cases of significant delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 17:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184630" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 126 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211209</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the dismissal of the appeals due to the delay in filing, emphasizing the need for a reasonable cause for condonation of delay. It clarified its limited jurisdiction under Section 254(2), stating that rectification cannot review a detailed order. The Tribunal stressed that once a finding is made after considering all submissions, it cannot be revisited, especially in cases of significant delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>