<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 712 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211190</link>
    <description>Rebate of duty on exported goods cannot be denied where the goods were duty paid, actually exported, and the substantive conditions for rebate were satisfied. A jurisdictional objection based on the precise designation of the officer who processed and sanctioned the claim was treated as a technical defect that could not defeat a rebate already granted. The same principle applied to procedural irregularities in filing or processing the claim: when the goods were cleared from a registered warehouse and the competent officer entertained the claim without returning it as defective, procedural lapses did not justify recovery or denial of the sanctioned rebate.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Mar 2012 16:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184611" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 712 - GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211190</link>
      <description>Rebate of duty on exported goods cannot be denied where the goods were duty paid, actually exported, and the substantive conditions for rebate were satisfied. A jurisdictional objection based on the precise designation of the officer who processed and sanctioned the claim was treated as a technical defect that could not defeat a rebate already granted. The same principle applied to procedural irregularities in filing or processing the claim: when the goods were cleared from a registered warehouse and the competent officer entertained the claim without returning it as defective, procedural lapses did not justify recovery or denial of the sanctioned rebate.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211190</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>