<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 711 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211186</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s services transitioned from not constituting storage and warehousing pre-2004 to falling under &quot;Airport Services&quot; thereafter. The appellant was directed to deposit for appeal admission, with the remaining duty, interest, and penalties waived. The decision emphasized the importance of clarity in interpreting legal provisions and upheld tax liability under the relevant classification post-2004.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184607" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 711 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211186</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the appellant&#039;s services transitioned from not constituting storage and warehousing pre-2004 to falling under &quot;Airport Services&quot; thereafter. The appellant was directed to deposit for appeal admission, with the remaining duty, interest, and penalties waived. The decision emphasized the importance of clarity in interpreting legal provisions and upheld tax liability under the relevant classification post-2004.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>