https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211185 Where the seized substance, on the chemical analyst report and the applicable notification, fell within the specific entry for opium derivatives under the NDPS Act, it was treated as commercial quantity and not as a neutral mixture governed by the general mixture entry. The Court held that the specific opium-derivative notification entry prevailed over the general entry for mixtures or preparations, so the extended period under Section 36-A(4) applied instead of the ordinary sixty-day rule under Section 167(2) CrPC. On that basis, default bail granted by the trial court was not sustainable and was liable to be set aside. en-us Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 08 Mar 2012 18:55:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211185 Where the seized substance, on the chemical analyst report and the applicable notification, fell within the specific entry for opium derivatives under the NDPS Act, it was treated as commercial quantity and not as a neutral mixture governed by the general mixture entry. The Court held that the specific opium-derivative notification entry prevailed over the general entry for mixtures or preparations, so the extended period under Section 36-A(4) applied instead of the ordinary sixty-day rule under Section 167(2) CrPC. On that basis, default bail granted by the trial court was not sustainable and was liable to be set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211185