<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 701 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211163</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief. The excess recovery of Sales Tax was not considered part of the assessable value, and the demand was barred by limitation. The penalty was set aside as there was no malafide intention to evade duty, especially considering the appellant&#039;s status as a Public Sector Undertaking.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 701 - CESTAT, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211163</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside with consequential relief. The excess recovery of Sales Tax was not considered part of the assessable value, and the demand was barred by limitation. The penalty was set aside as there was no malafide intention to evade duty, especially considering the appellant&#039;s status as a Public Sector Undertaking.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>