<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 699 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211161</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Appellate Authority to reduce penalties imposed on the assessee from Rs. 1,11,769 to Rs. 10,000. The Tribunal found no legal infirmity in the reduction, as it was established that the non-payment of service tax was not intentional and a sufficient cause was shown for the default. As both fact-finding authorities agreed on this point, the appeal was dismissed, favoring the assessee and confirming the reduction of penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2012 17:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 699 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211161</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Appellate Authority to reduce penalties imposed on the assessee from Rs. 1,11,769 to Rs. 10,000. The Tribunal found no legal infirmity in the reduction, as it was established that the non-payment of service tax was not intentional and a sufficient cause was shown for the default. As both fact-finding authorities agreed on this point, the appeal was dismissed, favoring the assessee and confirming the reduction of penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211161</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>