<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 103 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211148</link>
    <description>HC held that a share broker is entitled to a deduction for bad debts under s.36(1)(vii) read with s.36(2) in respect of amounts unpaid by clients for transactions. Since brokerage was credited to the profit &amp; loss account, part of the debt was taken into account for computing income, satisfying s.36(2)(i). The liability for brokerage and the transaction value together form the same debt; timing differences are immaterial. The Special Bench view was upheld; the question of adjusting the value of unsold shares against amounts receivable remains for the regular Bench. Appeal allowed for the assessee; no costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 14:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 103 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211148</link>
      <description>HC held that a share broker is entitled to a deduction for bad debts under s.36(1)(vii) read with s.36(2) in respect of amounts unpaid by clients for transactions. Since brokerage was credited to the profit &amp; loss account, part of the debt was taken into account for computing income, satisfying s.36(2)(i). The liability for brokerage and the transaction value together form the same debt; timing differences are immaterial. The Special Bench view was upheld; the question of adjusting the value of unsold shares against amounts receivable remains for the regular Bench. Appeal allowed for the assessee; no costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211148</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>