<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 101 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211146</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on both issues. The judgment clarified the application of Section 10B and related provisions, emphasizing the absence of statutory restrictions on setting off losses within the same head of income. The decision underscores the importance of legal interpretation and adherence to established precedents in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 10:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184570" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 101 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211146</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Tribunal&#039;s decisions on both issues. The judgment clarified the application of Section 10B and related provisions, emphasizing the absence of statutory restrictions on setting off losses within the same head of income. The decision underscores the importance of legal interpretation and adherence to established precedents in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211146</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>