<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 1003 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211132</link>
    <description>Customs valuation may be based on invoice value or rejected where contemporaneous documents and reliable admissions show that the declared transaction value does not reflect the true basis of import. For Swarovski glass chatons and beads, the documents did not establish stock-lot status, the manufacturer&#039;s gross-basis price list applied, and the importer&#039;s statements and correspondence supported undervaluation and rejection of the declared value, including invocation of the extended period. For Preciosa goods, the record was mixed and did not displace the declared value with comparable certainty, so the importer received the benefit of doubt and the demand was not sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2012 08:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184557" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 1003 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211132</link>
      <description>Customs valuation may be based on invoice value or rejected where contemporaneous documents and reliable admissions show that the declared transaction value does not reflect the true basis of import. For Swarovski glass chatons and beads, the documents did not establish stock-lot status, the manufacturer&#039;s gross-basis price list applied, and the importer&#039;s statements and correspondence supported undervaluation and rejection of the declared value, including invocation of the extended period. For Preciosa goods, the record was mixed and did not displace the declared value with comparable certainty, so the importer received the benefit of doubt and the demand was not sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211132</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>