https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211127 A challenge to the learned Single Judge's refusal to interfere was not entertained because the appellant had not pursued the statutory appellate remedy within the prescribed time. The High Court found no merit in the appeal, accepted the Single Judge's view, and held that there was no basis to differ from that conclusion. The refusal to interfere was therefore sustained. en-us Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 06 Mar 2012 08:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211127 A challenge to the learned Single Judge's refusal to interfere was not entertained because the appellant had not pursued the statutory appellate remedy within the prescribed time. The High Court found no merit in the appeal, accepted the Single Judge's view, and held that there was no basis to differ from that conclusion. The refusal to interfere was therefore sustained. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211127