<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 80 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211113</link>
    <description>HC held that the assessee, having invested capital gains in a residential property within twelve months and having substantial construction completed within three years, was entitled to deduction under Section 54F despite the building not being fully constructed within the statutory period. The Court endorsed the Tribunal&#039;s view that incomplete formalities do not disentitle an assessee who has demonstrably invested sale proceeds in residential construction. Decision rendered against the Revenue; benefit of Section 54F affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2025 14:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184539" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 80 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211113</link>
      <description>HC held that the assessee, having invested capital gains in a residential property within twelve months and having substantial construction completed within three years, was entitled to deduction under Section 54F despite the building not being fully constructed within the statutory period. The Court endorsed the Tribunal&#039;s view that incomplete formalities do not disentitle an assessee who has demonstrably invested sale proceeds in residential construction. Decision rendered against the Revenue; benefit of Section 54F affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211113</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>