<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 684 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211105</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled that penalties under Sections 271E and 271D could not be imposed on the assessee company as the transactions were carried out by the directors individually. Therefore, both penalties were removed, and the appeals were granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 12:09:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184531" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 684 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211105</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled that penalties under Sections 271E and 271D could not be imposed on the assessee company as the transactions were carried out by the directors individually. Therefore, both penalties were removed, and the appeals were granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211105</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>