<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (5) TMI 681 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211102</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) regarding unaccounted sales and commission income. The allegations of forcible extraction of statements were dismissed due to lack of evidence and delayed retraction. The tribunal found the documents to be genuine, rejecting the claim of fabrication. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 11.05.2011.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 18:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (5) TMI 681 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211102</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the additions made by the Assessing Officer and confirmed by the CIT(A) regarding unaccounted sales and commission income. The allegations of forcible extraction of statements were dismissed due to lack of evidence and delayed retraction. The tribunal found the documents to be genuine, rejecting the claim of fabrication. The appeal of the assessee was dismissed, and the decision was pronounced on 11.05.2011.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>