https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211099 Quashing under Section 482 CrPC is warranted only when a complaint discloses no offence or is frivolous, vexatious or oppressive; at the summoning stage, the court does not test evidence or finally decide disputed issues of knowledge, intention or participation. Applying that standard, the complaint alleging manipulation of bills of lading and export dates disclosed material suggesting the petitioners' involvement in the customs offence, so the challenge to the complaint and summoning order was rejected. The objection that the companies for whom the petitioners worked were not joined was treated as premature at the threshold and did not vitiate the proceedings. en-us Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Oct 2012 16:41:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211099 Quashing under Section 482 CrPC is warranted only when a complaint discloses no offence or is frivolous, vexatious or oppressive; at the summoning stage, the court does not test evidence or finally decide disputed issues of knowledge, intention or participation. Applying that standard, the complaint alleging manipulation of bills of lading and export dates disclosed material suggesting the petitioners' involvement in the customs offence, so the challenge to the complaint and summoning order was rejected. The objection that the companies for whom the petitioners worked were not joined was treated as premature at the threshold and did not vitiate the proceedings. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 24 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211099