<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 780 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211085</link>
    <description>Transaction charges collected by stock brokers and payable to the National Stock Exchange were treated as not form ing part of brokerage for service tax purposes, following earlier Tribunal decisions on the same issue. The text notes that no contrary authority or ground was shown to depart from that settled position, so the inclusion of such charges in the taxable value of brokerage was rejected and the assessee&#039;s position was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 18:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 780 - CESTAT, DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211085</link>
      <description>Transaction charges collected by stock brokers and payable to the National Stock Exchange were treated as not form ing part of brokerage for service tax purposes, following earlier Tribunal decisions on the same issue. The text notes that no contrary authority or ground was shown to depart from that settled position, so the inclusion of such charges in the taxable value of brokerage was rejected and the assessee&#039;s position was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211085</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>