<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 818 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211066</link>
    <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s order concerning the forfeiture of properties under the SAFEM Act, 1976, due to inadequate consideration of legal provisions and precedents. The SC remitted the cases for fresh consideration, emphasizing the necessity of evaluating the validity of notices and forfeiture orders in accordance with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2024 11:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184493" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 818 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211066</link>
      <description>The SC set aside the HC&#039;s order concerning the forfeiture of properties under the SAFEM Act, 1976, due to inadequate consideration of legal provisions and precedents. The SC remitted the cases for fresh consideration, emphasizing the necessity of evaluating the validity of notices and forfeiture orders in accordance with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211066</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>