<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1381 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211064</link>
    <description>The court found the detention order to be vitiated due to non-application of mind by the Detaining Authority, as it was based on inconclusive test reports from non-notified laboratories and improper valuation of the contraband. Consequently, the Habeas Corpus Petition was allowed, and the detention order was set aside, ordering the release of the detenu unless required in connection with any other case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184491" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1381 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211064</link>
      <description>The court found the detention order to be vitiated due to non-application of mind by the Detaining Authority, as it was based on inconclusive test reports from non-notified laboratories and improper valuation of the contraband. Consequently, the Habeas Corpus Petition was allowed, and the detention order was set aside, ordering the release of the detenu unless required in connection with any other case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211064</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>