<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (12) TMI 270 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211063</link>
    <description>The court admitted the petition for winding up the respondent-company due to non-payment of dues totaling Rs. 19,41,499/- for computers and laptops provided on a rental basis. Despite the respondent&#039;s denial and counterclaims, the court found the petitioner&#039;s evidence of debt acknowledgment and non-return of laptops compelling. The respondent&#039;s defenses were deemed baseless, leading to a ruling in favor of the petitioner. The court emphasized the respondent&#039;s willful negligence in payment and directed the petitioner to advertise the winding-up petition and set a hearing date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 11:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (12) TMI 270 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211063</link>
      <description>The court admitted the petition for winding up the respondent-company due to non-payment of dues totaling Rs. 19,41,499/- for computers and laptops provided on a rental basis. Despite the respondent&#039;s denial and counterclaims, the court found the petitioner&#039;s evidence of debt acknowledgment and non-return of laptops compelling. The respondent&#039;s defenses were deemed baseless, leading to a ruling in favor of the petitioner. The court emphasized the respondent&#039;s willful negligence in payment and directed the petitioner to advertise the winding-up petition and set a hearing date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>