<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (10) TMI 427 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211061</link>
    <description>The tribunal found in favor of the appellant, highlighting issues such as arbitrary adjudication, coercion in statement recording, failure to provide essential documents, lack of evidence supporting allegations, unlawful intervention, and inadequate evidence of clandestine activities. The lack of substantiating evidence, procedural irregularities, and failure to adhere to natural justice principles led to the tribunal allowing the appeals in favor of the appellant due to the unsustainable adjudication process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184488" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (10) TMI 427 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211061</link>
      <description>The tribunal found in favor of the appellant, highlighting issues such as arbitrary adjudication, coercion in statement recording, failure to provide essential documents, lack of evidence supporting allegations, unlawful intervention, and inadequate evidence of clandestine activities. The lack of substantiating evidence, procedural irregularities, and failure to adhere to natural justice principles led to the tribunal allowing the appeals in favor of the appellant due to the unsustainable adjudication process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>