<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 778 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211045</link>
    <description>A rebate notification confined the statutory concession to specified foreign destinations, but departmental manual instructions later extended the same facility to aircraft bound for Nepal, Afghanistan and Bhutan. The revisional authority could not disregard those administrative instructions and rely only on the notification, because the Union Government was expected to act consistently with its earlier determination. The impugned revisional order was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, with the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Mar 2012 22:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184472" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 778 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211045</link>
      <description>A rebate notification confined the statutory concession to specified foreign destinations, but departmental manual instructions later extended the same facility to aircraft bound for Nepal, Afghanistan and Bhutan. The revisional authority could not disregard those administrative instructions and rely only on the notification, because the Union Government was expected to act consistently with its earlier determination. The impugned revisional order was therefore unsustainable and was set aside, with the matter remitted for fresh consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211045</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>