<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 39 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211041</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal should have granted interim stay without the pre-deposit condition due to the strong prima facie case presented by the petitioner. However, to protect revenue interests, the petitioner was required to provide a bank guarantee. The Tribunal was instructed to promptly hear and resolve the appeal within six months. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2014 18:44:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 39 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211041</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal should have granted interim stay without the pre-deposit condition due to the strong prima facie case presented by the petitioner. However, to protect revenue interests, the petitioner was required to provide a bank guarantee. The Tribunal was instructed to promptly hear and resolve the appeal within six months. The writ petition was disposed of accordingly, with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>