https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211040 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Appellants, ruling that there was no merit in imposing penalties under Rule 209A or Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal found that the penalties imposed on the Appellants for incorrect Cenvat credit were not justified, and the impugned order lacked clarity on the legal basis for such penalties. As a result, the Appellants were provided with consequential relief as the penalties imposed were deemed not maintainable. en-us Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 04 Sep 2012 14:33:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211040 The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the Appellants, ruling that there was no merit in imposing penalties under Rule 209A or Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal found that the penalties imposed on the Appellants for incorrect Cenvat credit were not justified, and the impugned order lacked clarity on the legal basis for such penalties. As a result, the Appellants were provided with consequential relief as the penalties imposed were deemed not maintainable. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211040