<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (9) TMI 667 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211023</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case concerning expenditure treatment, specifically severance costs and marketing research expenses. The court affirmed that the assessee&#039;s suspension of manufacturing &quot;Tang&quot; did not constitute a business closure as other business activities continued. The severance costs were considered revenue expenditure due to the ongoing business operations, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as no substantial legal question arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2016 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (9) TMI 667 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211023</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision in a case concerning expenditure treatment, specifically severance costs and marketing research expenses. The court affirmed that the assessee&#039;s suspension of manufacturing &quot;Tang&quot; did not constitute a business closure as other business activities continued. The severance costs were considered revenue expenditure due to the ongoing business operations, leading to the dismissal of the appeal as no substantial legal question arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211023</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>