https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211013 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, setting aside the denial of Modvat Credit on steel items used as supporting structures. They disagreed with the Commissioner's rejection of the Chartered Engineer's certificate, noting factual inaccuracies and directing a fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a reevaluation of minor issues related to credit availability for welding electrodes and capital consumption notification, without expressing an opinion on these matters. The case was remanded for a more detailed examination, ensuring a fair resolution of the disputed issues. en-us Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:46:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211013 The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, setting aside the denial of Modvat Credit on steel items used as supporting structures. They disagreed with the Commissioner's rejection of the Chartered Engineer's certificate, noting factual inaccuracies and directing a fresh adjudication. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a reevaluation of minor issues related to credit availability for welding electrodes and capital consumption notification, without expressing an opinion on these matters. The case was remanded for a more detailed examination, ensuring a fair resolution of the disputed issues. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211013