<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (3) TMI 14 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211012</link>
    <description>The Tribunal determined that the joint-closure/box of optical fibre cables should be classified under heading 9033.00, aligning with the classification of optical fibre cables themselves under Chapter 90. This decision clarified the proper classification of parts and accessories, granting relief to the appellants based on legal precedent and interpretation of relevant tariff headings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Dec 2013 14:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184439" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (3) TMI 14 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211012</link>
      <description>The Tribunal determined that the joint-closure/box of optical fibre cables should be classified under heading 9033.00, aligning with the classification of optical fibre cables themselves under Chapter 90. This decision clarified the proper classification of parts and accessories, granting relief to the appellants based on legal precedent and interpretation of relevant tariff headings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211012</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>