https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211009 The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee-company and individual, rejecting the revenue's appeal. The impugned order was set aside due to limitations, lack of collusion allegations, and flawed show cause notice. The penalties and confiscation orders imposed by the Adjudicating Authority were deemed unsustainable. The judgment highlighted the significance of procedural compliance and the need for corroborative evidence in cases involving alleged clandestine removal. en-us Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 29 Feb 2012 16:37:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211009 The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee-company and individual, rejecting the revenue's appeal. The impugned order was set aside due to limitations, lack of collusion allegations, and flawed show cause notice. The penalties and confiscation orders imposed by the Adjudicating Authority were deemed unsustainable. The judgment highlighted the significance of procedural compliance and the need for corroborative evidence in cases involving alleged clandestine removal. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 05 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211009