<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (7) TMI 771 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211004</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that Event Management Services for organizing annual functions did not qualify as &quot;input services&quot; integral to manufacturing under the Cenvat Credit Rules, aligning with previous judgments. The appellant was directed to deposit a specified amount pending appeal. The interpretation of &quot;input service&quot; emphasized the need for activities directly linked to manufacturing processes to qualify for Cenvat credit. Precedents highlighted the requirement for services to contribute to core manufacturing processes for eligibility. The Tribunal deferred a detailed examination on the time bar issue, emphasizing compliance with pre-deposit requirements pending appeal resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:23:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184431" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (7) TMI 771 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211004</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that Event Management Services for organizing annual functions did not qualify as &quot;input services&quot; integral to manufacturing under the Cenvat Credit Rules, aligning with previous judgments. The appellant was directed to deposit a specified amount pending appeal. The interpretation of &quot;input service&quot; emphasized the need for activities directly linked to manufacturing processes to qualify for Cenvat credit. Precedents highlighted the requirement for services to contribute to core manufacturing processes for eligibility. The Tribunal deferred a detailed examination on the time bar issue, emphasizing compliance with pre-deposit requirements pending appeal resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=211004</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>