<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 401 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210996</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s decision to invoke Section 263, as the assessment order allowing the deduction under Section 80IB without the mandatory audit report was deemed erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to conduct a fresh assessment, considering the audit report submitted during the proceedings. The appeal by the assessee was partially allowed, emphasizing the significance of procedural compliance for tax deduction claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184423" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 401 - ITAT, Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210996</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income-tax&#039;s decision to invoke Section 263, as the assessment order allowing the deduction under Section 80IB without the mandatory audit report was deemed erroneous and prejudicial to the Revenue&#039;s interests. The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to conduct a fresh assessment, considering the audit report submitted during the proceedings. The appeal by the assessee was partially allowed, emphasizing the significance of procedural compliance for tax deduction claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>