<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 396 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210981</link>
    <description>Penalty for wrongful availment of Modvat credit is not justified where the credit was entered in statutory records, reversed promptly after departmental objection, and interest was paid. On these facts, the conduct did not show fraudulent intent, mala fide suppression, or any attempt to gain by wrongful availment, especially where the disputed amount was small against the available balance. The penalty was therefore rightly deleted, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 17:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 396 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210981</link>
      <description>Penalty for wrongful availment of Modvat credit is not justified where the credit was entered in statutory records, reversed promptly after departmental objection, and interest was paid. On these facts, the conduct did not show fraudulent intent, mala fide suppression, or any attempt to gain by wrongful availment, especially where the disputed amount was small against the available balance. The penalty was therefore rightly deleted, and the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210981</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>