<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (4) TMI 963 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210978</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Department, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order for interest payment on the refund claim. The appeal was successful, with the Tribunal finding no basis for interest payment under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act. Legal precedents were examined, and the Tribunal determined that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in directing interest payment, ultimately quashing the order for interest payment and ruling in favor of the Department.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 18:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184405" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (4) TMI 963 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210978</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the Department, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order for interest payment on the refund claim. The appeal was successful, with the Tribunal finding no basis for interest payment under Section 11BB of the Central Excise Act. Legal precedents were examined, and the Tribunal determined that the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in directing interest payment, ultimately quashing the order for interest payment and ruling in favor of the Department.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210978</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>