<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (2) TMI 1211 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demands of duty, interest, and penalties confirmed in the impugned orders, allowing the appeals filed by the assessee-company and its Directors. The appeal filed by the revenue to enhance the duty and penalties was rejected. The judgment emphasized the need for reliable and corroborative evidence to substantiate claims of clandestine production and removal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 09:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184404" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (2) TMI 1211 - CESTAT,  BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demands of duty, interest, and penalties confirmed in the impugned orders, allowing the appeals filed by the assessee-company and its Directors. The appeal filed by the revenue to enhance the duty and penalties was rejected. The judgment emphasized the need for reliable and corroborative evidence to substantiate claims of clandestine production and removal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>