<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (2) TMI 392 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210975</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi found the stay application infractuous due to the absence of an executable order. The appeal for refund of service tax paid on export-related charges was allowed as the Tribunal found no evidence of non-receipt of goods or non-incurrence of handling charges. Both the stay petition and appeal were disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 07:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (2) TMI 392 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210975</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi found the stay application infractuous due to the absence of an executable order. The appeal for refund of service tax paid on export-related charges was allowed as the Tribunal found no evidence of non-receipt of goods or non-incurrence of handling charges. Both the stay petition and appeal were disposed of in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210975</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>