<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1373 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210974</link>
    <description>HC held that expenses for a state function (shamiyana, photography, related services) were not personal benefits but had an integral nexus with the business of manufacture and maintenance of industrial peace; therefore they qualified as input services and the service tax paid was admissible as CENVAT credit. The court answered the substantial question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue, allowing one appeal and dismissing the counter-appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 10:58:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184401" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1373 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210974</link>
      <description>HC held that expenses for a state function (shamiyana, photography, related services) were not personal benefits but had an integral nexus with the business of manufacture and maintenance of industrial peace; therefore they qualified as input services and the service tax paid was admissible as CENVAT credit. The court answered the substantial question in favour of the assessee and against the revenue, allowing one appeal and dismissing the counter-appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210974</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>