https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210972 The respondent sought stepping up of pay in line with two juniors, Kamalasanan and Dayanand. The Central Administrative Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, stating that pay can be stepped up to match an admitted junior at each post. The Tribunal directed the establishment to comply with the decision without identifying any errors. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, instructing implementation without costs by a specified date, emphasizing adherence to rules and conditions. en-us Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 16 May 2012 19:02:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210972 The respondent sought stepping up of pay in line with two juniors, Kamalasanan and Dayanand. The Central Administrative Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, stating that pay can be stepped up to match an admitted junior at each post. The Tribunal directed the establishment to comply with the decision without identifying any errors. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, instructing implementation without costs by a specified date, emphasizing adherence to rules and conditions. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 17 Feb 2012 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210972