<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (8) TMI 814 - Gujarat High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210960</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying the higher depreciation rate to the assessee not engaged in hiring out vehicles. However, the court sided with the assessee, allowing the depreciation claim for vehicles registered in directors&#039; names but used for the company&#039;s business. The judgments of previous cases and the specific business activities of the assessee played crucial roles in determining the outcomes for each issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2012 13:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184387" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (8) TMI 814 - Gujarat High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210960</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the Revenue, denying the higher depreciation rate to the assessee not engaged in hiring out vehicles. However, the court sided with the assessee, allowing the depreciation claim for vehicles registered in directors&#039; names but used for the company&#039;s business. The judgments of previous cases and the specific business activities of the assessee played crucial roles in determining the outcomes for each issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Aug 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>