<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (9) TMI 870 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210956</link>
    <description>The High Court held in favor of the revenue, ruling that lease rental income should be taxed in regular assessment proceedings despite previous decisions. The court disallowed the provision for warranty claims as a deductible expenditure due to insufficient evidence and lack of systematic methodology, overturning the decisions of the Tribunal and the Appellate Commissioner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=184383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (9) TMI 870 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210956</link>
      <description>The High Court held in favor of the revenue, ruling that lease rental income should be taxed in regular assessment proceedings despite previous decisions. The court disallowed the provision for warranty claims as a deductible expenditure due to insufficient evidence and lack of systematic methodology, overturning the decisions of the Tribunal and the Appellate Commissioner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=210956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>